Gradient pastel rainbow background. Boxes of various sizes containing text answering answering “What did we do?”, “New & Notable”, and “What did we learn?”, and “What is remote biological sample collection?”. Illustrations of donating blood and a couple. Title with citation: Experiences with Remote Biological Sample Collection Among LGBTQIA+ Participants Panyanouvong et al., Annals of LGBTQ Public and Population Health [2024]

Willingness of Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ communities to donate biological samples

The following is a press release from The Pride Study dated April 16, 2024:

Official Title

Our needs have been ignored for a long time: Factors affecting willingness of Black and Hispanic/Latinx sexual and gender minority communities to donate biospecimens

Community Title

Willingness of Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ communities to donate biological samples

What Did We Do?

We interviewed 22 LGBTQIA+ participants from The PRIDE Study who identified as Black and/or Hispanic/Latinx to understand what would influence their decision to donate biological samples (i.e., biospecimens, such as blood, hair, saliva, and urine) for substance use research. We did this because Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ people are underrepresented in substance use research.

What Was New, Innovative, or Notable?

This was one of the first studies to explore what affects willingness to donate biological samples among Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ communities. This is important because these communities have often been excluded from or mistreated in substance use research.

What Did We Learn?

We identified 8 themes around what influences Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ participants’ willingness to donate biological samples for substance use research: 1) community benefits; 2) personal benefits; 3) feeling that the community is being taken advantage of; 4) personal risks; 5) convenience; 6) trustworthiness of the research team; 7) perceived value in donating; and 8) biological sample collection being seen as more normal because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Participants were highly motivated to donate their biological samples to increase knowledge about the needs and improve the health of their communities. Most participants expressed concern about data security, privacy, and misuse. Many participants referenced past unfair and poor treatment that people from their communities have faced in health care and research.

What Does This Mean for Our Communities?

Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ people are motivated to donate their biological samples if researchers use ethical practices and explain the purpose of the study. Examples include protecting participant data and clearly communicating the steps involved in biological sample donation. Researchers can use the findings from this study to increase representation from Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ people and to reduce substance use among these communities.

What’s Next?

Researchers can apply the suggestions shared in the paper. For instance, researchers can build trust with Black and Hispanic/Latinx LGBTQIA+ communities and provide education about biological sample donation during the consent process. Future research should explore if following these participant recommendations leads to actual changes in biological sample donation.

Action Steps

See http://www.pridestudy.org/study for more information and to share this study with your friends and family.

If you are interested in conducting research related to LGBTQIA+ health, please learn more about collaborating with The PRIDE Study at http://pridestudy.org/collaborate.

Citation

Ceja, A., Bruno, V., Panyanouvong, N. L., Aguilar, J., Raygani, S., Lubensky, M. E., Dastur, Z., Lunn, M. R., Obedin-Maliver, J., & Flentje, A. Our needs have been ignored for a long time: Factors affecting willingness of Black and Hispanic/Latinx sexual and gender minority communities to donate biospecimens. Annals of LGBTQ Public and Population Health. 2024 March 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1891/LGBTQ-2023-0022.

View the full paper at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/32d9g3wc.

LGBTQIA+ People’s Experiences with Chronic Pain

LGBTQIA+ People’s Experiences with Chronic Pain

The following is a press release issued by The Pride Study on April 11, 2024:

Official Title

Localized and Widespread Chronic Pain in Sexual and Gender Minority People – An Analysis of The PRIDE Study

Community Title

LGBTQIA+ People’s Experiences with Chronic Pain

What Did We Do?

Chronic pain is defined as pain that a person experiences for three months or longer. Other studies have reported that up to 20% of American adults experience chronic pain, but this research has mainly been done with cisgender and heterosexual populations. The goal of our study was to identify and describe the experiences of chronic pain among LGBTQIA+ persons using data from 5,397 participants who completed The PRIDE Study’s 2022 Annual Questionnaire.

What Was New, Innovative, or Notable? 

This is one of the first studies to explore if chronic pain is widespread among LGBTQIA+ persons and in which part(s) of the body they experience chronic pain.

What Did We Learn? 

The findings from this study highlight that chronic pain in certain areas of the body and having chronic widespread pain are commonly seen in LGBTQIA+ participants in The PRIDE Study. The most common locations of chronic pain in LGBTQIA+ participants are the neck, upper back, and lower back. Approximately one-third of participants who identified as non-binary, another gender identity, a transgender man, queer, asexual/demisexual/gray ace, and another sexual orientation reported having chronic widespread pain.

What Does This Mean for Our Communities?

The findings of this study show that there are increased numbers of LGBTQIA+ persons reporting chronic pain (approximately 55%) compared to other studies with cisgender and heterosexual persons (approximately 20%). Our findings also highlight that chronic widespread pain is present in increased numbers of LGBTQIA+ persons (approximately 15-37%) compared to other studies with cisgender and heterosexual persons (approximately 10%). Chronic pain is a leading cause of disability and decreased quality of life. It is important for healthcare providers to understand there is an increased presence of chronic pain in LGBTQIA+ persons so that they can provide better support and healthcare.

What’s Next? 

Future studies are planned to understand what factors lead to increased chronic pain and chronic widespread pain in LGBTQIA+ persons.

Action Steps

See http://www.pridestudy.org/study for more information and to share this study with your friends and family.

If you are interested in conducting research related to LGBTQIA+ health, please learn more about collaborating with The PRIDE Study at http://pridestudy.org/collaborate.

Citation

Chadwick AL, Lisha NE, Lubensky ME, Dastur Z, Lunn MR, Obedin-Maliver J, Flentje A. Localized and widespread chronic pain in sexual and gender minority people—an analysis of the PRIDE study. Pain Medicine. 2024 March 26; pnae023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae023. Epub ahead of print.

View the full paper at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4p94g4wt.

Photo used courtesy of Gender Spectrum

Image description: a light purple background with a dark purple DV awareness ribbon “Help a DV victim fight back” with a photo of Katy

Help a DV Victim Fight Back

If you’ve known me for really any length of time, it’s quite likely that you’ve heard me talk about my best friend Katy.

We had a class together in our sophomore year of college. I remember thinking how cool she was and how much I wanted to be her friend.

Cut to senior year, and I’d succeeded! We lived together on campus, having regular dance parties, supporting each other through the swine flu, and helping each other stay awake during all-nighters.

Through heavy depression, transitioning, and cutting contact with my abusive mother, she has always been there for me.

And she’s been going through it over the last year.

She’s had to flee the home she owns for her safety, spending money both on trying to keep the home her ex is squatting in and keeping herself safe. It’s been unsustainable for a long time, but especially now after 250 days

Breaking free from abusers is one of the hardest things someone can do, and it shouldn’t have to cost everything she has and more.

Please join me in uplifting Katy, whether that’s offering in-kind support, sharing her story, or donating to her GoFundMe campaign. Every share & donation, no matter how big or small, makes a difference in helping her rebuild her life and continue the legal fight against her ex.

Because everyone should be able to break free from the cycle of abuse and rebuild a life filled with safety, dignity, and hope — but especially someone who has done so much to help others going through abuse and domestic violence.

 

Katy’s GFM link

https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-a-dv-survivors-journey-to-freedom

 

Can’t help out financially?

That’s okay! Research shows that sharing posts can help a lot — even just liking & social media posts makes a difference. Here are a few of mine that you can feel free to share:

Thank you so much for considering helping her out.

All my best,
Grayson

Reproductive Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatic Diseases

A recent study found that reproductive health outcomes for folks with rheumatic diseases were affected by their conditions.

Conducted on a Finnish registry, they found that most rheumatic diseases caused higher risk for pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, caesarean sections, and neonatal intensive care.

Note: this study seemed to be limited to cisgender individuals.

You can read the full study or a summary of it here.

Have you had gender-affirming genital surgery? you can improve patient outcomes today!

Gender COS

Have you ever wondered how researchers, providers, and patients figure out how to measure success?

In some organizations, this requires researching what’s already been pulled together, like conducting a review of published research and journal articles.

Even if they do that, some groups also come together to create what’s known as a Core Outcome Set or COS.

A group is working to come up with a COS for genital surgery. It is vital that transgender and gender diverse folks are a part of this research —otherwise, it won’t encompass the right outcomes.

Interested? You can participate if:

  • You are transgender and/or gender diverse and have undergone genital gender surgery at least 3 months ago & you can read and understand English, Spanish or Dutch AND you are of legal age to undergo genital gender surgery in country of received surgery
  • You are a surgeon specialized in genital gender surgery (plastic surgeons, general surgeons, urologists, gynecologists)
  • You are another type of professional in gender healthcare, related to gender surgery (such as psychologists, endocrinologists, physiotherapists, sexologists, physician assistants, nurses, psychiatrists)
  • OR/AND Authors who have published at least 5 articles on research into genital gender surgery and who have also worked in gender care.

Learn more here

Please note that I am not affiliated with this group. I’ve worked on several COS for other research groups, such as OMERACT, though. So, if you have questions about the general COS process, I’m happy to chat!

Photo used courtesy of Gender Spectrum

Experiences of Conversion Practice by Race, Ethnicity, and Gender

The following is a press release issued by The Pride Study on Wednesday, March 13, 2024:

Official Title

Inequities in Conversion Practice Exposure at the Intersection of Ethnoracial and Gender Identities

Community Title

Experiences of Conversion Practice by Race, Ethnicity, and Gender

What Did We Do?

Conversion practices refer to organized attempts to change the sexual orientation and/or gender identity of people who are LGBTQIA+. Some examples include religious rituals and therapy intended to cause a person to associate negative thoughts with being LGBTQIA+. We looked at experiences of conversion practice in The PRIDE Study’s Lifetime Health and Experiences Questionnaire from 2019-2021 among LGTBQIA+ people. We asked participants if they had any conversion practice experiences in their lifetime, the age when they first experienced conversion practice, and the age when they last experienced conversion practice. We then looked at how experiences of conversion practice differed by race, ethnicity, and gender.

What Was New, Innovative, or Notable? 

This is one of the first studies that looked at how experiences of conversion practice differ by race, ethnicity, and gender. We considered how different identities experience power and oppression and how this may have shaped the experiences of conversion practice for different LGBTQIA+ groups.

What Did We Learn? 

There were 9,274 LGBTQIA+ participants in the study. Of them, 5.7% of LGBTQIA+ participants reported any experiences with conversion practice in their life. On average, participants were 18 years old when they first experienced conversion practice and 21 years old when they last experienced it. This resulted in an average of 3 years between their first and last experience with conversion practice. A higher percentage of transgender and nonbinary participants reported conversion practice experiences, especially participants who are American Indian or Alaska Native and/or Middle Eastern or North African.

What Does This Mean for Our Communities? 

Systems of power and oppression may likely shape differences in conversion practice experiences across LGTBQIA+ groups. This may be important for creating federal and local policies that ban conversion practice to protect LGBTQIA+ groups and reduce the harmful effects of such practices, especially for communities who may be affected the most.

What’s Next? 

We plan to look at how different experiences of conversion practice affect mental health. This involves understanding how practices targeting sexual orientation, gender identity, or both can impact mental health differently for LGBTQIA+ individuals.

Citation

Tran NK, Lett E, Flentje A, Ingram S, Lubensky ME, Dastur Z, Obedin-Maliver J, Lunn MR. Inequities in Conversion Practice Exposure at the Intersection of Ethnoracial and Gender Identities. Am J Public Health. 2024, March 13; 114 (4): 424-434. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307580

2022 US Trans Survey Early Insights

The following is from an email sent out by the National Center for Transgender Equity on Feb. 7, 2024:

We know you’ve been waiting, and now the day is finally here! The National Center for Transgender Equality is proud to announce the release of the first report from the 2022 U.S. Trans Survey – the Early Insights report!

A record number of transgender people took the 2022 survey – 92,329 to be exact. That’s over three times the number of respondents of the last survey in 2015. We appreciate every one of you who took or shared the survey, and now we’re finally able to share the first of many reports to be released.

The lessons from the report are clear: trans people in the survey said that living as their authentic selves made them more satisfied with their lives and that they have sources of support, yet still face many challenges in areas like accessing health care and accurate IDs.

Here are a just a few highlights from the Early Insights report:

Trans people in the survey reported greater life satisfaction after transitioning. Nearly all respondents (94%) who lived at least some of the time in a different gender than the one they were assigned at birth (“gender transition”) reported that they were either “a lot more satisfied” (79%) or “a little more satisfied” (15%) with their life.

Discriminatory policies cause real harm. Nearly half (47%) of respondents had thought about moving to another state because their state government considered or passed laws that target transgender people for unequal treatment (such as banning access to bathrooms, health care, or sports), and 5% of respondents had actually moved out of state because of such state action.

Without question, misinformation and a lack of understanding is underpinning the escalating legislative attacks on our community. But with the 2022 USTS, the largest survey ever conducted on the experiences of transgender and nonbinary people in the country, we are once again combatting that misinformation with hard data about trans lives.

Check out the Early Insights report at ustranssurvey.org. We made major changes to the site to make it easier to share the data with PDF and web versions of the report, including interactive charts. You can also view the full website en español.

Special thanks to our partners, the National Black Trans Advocacy Coalition, the TransLatin@ Coalition, and the National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance, for making this survey possible. And to you, for being part of the NCTE community – we couldn’t have done this without you.

With gratitude,
Rodrigo Heng-Lehtinen
(he/him)
Executive Director

May be a graphic of text that says 'CWU Central Washington University Do you identify as having a visible disability and age 18 to 64? Do you have about 10 minutes to complete our anonymous online survey? My research partner and I are studying how media relates to self-esteem within the disability community, as a part of our master's program at Central Washington University. We would greatly appreciate your time! Please share our survey with others in the disability community! Survey linked below!'

Self-Esteem, Media Representation, and Disability

Research: Hello. We are graduate students in the Child Development and Family Science program at Central Washington University. As a part of our Research Methods course, we are conducting a survey on self-esteem within the disability community. We would appreciate you taking a few minutes to complete these questions.

Purpose: This research is examining the relationship of media representation and self-esteem of people with visible, physical disabilities (PWVPD)]. This knowledge can help individuals within the media provide more accurate representation of the disability community.

Procedure: This survey should only take between 5 and 10 minutes to complete, and is completely online.

Risks/Benefits: All of the questions are self-report and assess your own opinions and experience. There are limited anticipated risks. However, some of the questions ask about your disability and self-esteem and may cause discomfort or negative feelings. You may stop participating at any time if you feel uncomfortable, and there are resources provided at the end of the survey.

Confidentiality: All of the information you provide will be anonymous. Reasonable and appropriate safeguards have been used in the creation of the web-based survey to maximize the security of your responses; however, when using technology, it is never possible to guarantee complete privacy. No efforts, however, will be made to tie any responses provided to you personally, and no identifying information will be requested.

Voluntary: Your participation in this survey is completely voluntary. You may elect to participate, and if you chose to begin, you may skip any question that you do not feel like answering or terminate your participation at any time. Declining to participate will in no way affect your relationship with Central Washington University, or with the researchers.

Want to take this survey? Click here.

A genderqueer person looking at their phone - Active Social Media Use and Health in the LGBTQIA+ Community

Active Social Media Use and Health in the LGBTQIA+ Community

The following is a press release issued by The Pride Study on Thursday, January 4, 2023:

Official Title

Active social media use and health indicators among sexual and gender minority adults

Community Title

Active Social Media Use and Health in the LGBTQIA+ Community

What Did We Do?

We looked at data from The PRIDE Study 2017 Annual Questionnaire around active social media use and health. To measure active social media use, we considered how participants rated their own use of social networking sites as active or passive and their frequency of commenting on friends’ posts or interacting with others. We examined whether people with more active social media use had better or worse health.

What Was New, Innovative, or Notable?

This was one of the first studies to measure how much LGBTQIA+ people use social media actively, not just how much time they spend on social media. Using social media actively might have different effects than just browsing.

What Did We Learn?

Individuals with more active social media use were more likely to feel depressed, smoke cigarettes, not sleep enough, and not get enough physical activity, compared to individuals with less active social media use.

What Does This Mean for Our Communities? 

More active social media usage may play a role in experiencing poor health. While social media usage may also positively affect our health in other ways, being mindful of our social media use may be good for our health.

What’s Next? 

We don’t know whether more active use of social media worsens health, or whether people with poorer health use social media more actively. We want to survey LGBTQIA+ individuals over a longer period of time to examine this relationship more closely.

Action Steps

See http://www.pridestudy.org/study for more information and to share this study with your friends and family.

If you are interested in conducting research related to LGBTQIA+ health, please learn more about collaborating with The PRIDE Study at http://pridestudy.org/collaborate.

Citation

Vogel EA, Flentje A, Lunn MR, Obedin-Maliver J, Capriotti MR, Ramo DE, Prochaska JJ. Active social media use and health indicators among sexual and gender minority adults. LGBT Health.  Vol 0 Ahead of Print. December 28, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0170

View the full PDF at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/30w4w10n

Photo used courtesy of Gender Spectrum

Gov. DeWine: Please Veto HB 68

Gov. DeWine: Please Veto HB 68

According to a 2022 survey, transgender adults make up just 0.51% of Ohioans. That’s roughly 46,000 adults. As of 2021, there were 11.78 million people in the state. There were approximately 8500 trans folks between the ages of 13-17 and another 12,200 aged 18-24. HB 68 would prevent the under-18 group from accessing puberty blockers (which pause puberty and are harmless), hormone replacement therapy (HRT), some types of mental healthcare, or other gender affirming healthcare. Health care professionals who provide these kinds of care could lose their licenses and be sued.

It would also affect the ability of specifically trans women and feminine people to play sports in Kindergarten through college. Earlier this spring, the Ohio Cap Journal reported that there were only six trans girls playing sports in Ohio who would be affected.

That’s right — six.

This is clearly transmisogyny, a particular form of both sexism and transphobia that work together to harm trans girls, women, and feminine folks.

Considering the six, it’s wild how much time, energy, and taxpayer money has been spent on this bill over the last couple of years. An iteration of this bill was introduced last legislative session, too, by the same person even.

DeWine previously said in 2021 that he was against sports bans, stating,

This issue is best addressed outside of government, through individual sports leagues and athletic associations, including the Ohio High School Athletic Association, who can tailor policies to meet the needs of their member athletes and member institutions.

I am (perhaps misguidedly) hopeful that he sees the absurdity in these bills. I highly encourage you to reach out, especially if you’re in Ohio, have a connection to Ohio (waves), and/or are a part of or an ally to the transgender community.

What follows is a letter I sent to Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine Thursday, December 14, 2023, in response to the state legislative bodies passing HB 68 on Wednesday. Gov. DeWine has 10 days from Wednesday to sign HB 68 into law OR veto it.

 

My Letter

I am writing to you as a concerned citizen to urgently request that you veto House Bill 68, which prevents transgender youth from receiving gender-affirming health care and participating in school sports consistent with their gender identity. This is a dangerous bill that would harm the safety and well-being of LGBTQ+ youth, not to mention healthcare providers and those in the athletic community.

I urge you to please veto this bill.

I write to you as an internationally renowned sex educator and researcher, someone who works with groups ranging from Harvard Medical School and the American College of Rheumatology to local movements and governments across the nation. I create educational content, helping people to learn about minoritized groups, which has improved how Fortune 500 companies learn about the world and how to act within it in better ways. From my time living in Wisconsin to my time here in Ohio, I have worked internationally to improve understanding of accessibility, healthcare, and the patient experience – including working with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to lessen the rates of preventable chronic diseases.

Above all else, I write to you as a transgender man, as someone who is wildly negatively affected both personally and professionally by transphobia. I can tell you that HB 68 will worsen the viewpoints of Ohio as a state worth moving to or attending college in.

It will increase the amount of hate a very small minority of people receive. For it to specifically target children is abhorrent.

 

A Word on Trans Youth in Sports

The anti-trans sports ban (which we saw in the last general assembly as SB 132 and HB 151) is an example of extreme government overreach and intervention. The Ohio High School Athletic Association and NCAA already have scientifically supported policies in place to ensure that sports are fair and accessible to all. These are experts who have studied this topic in-depth, connected with true experts, and deeply understand these issues.

Legislators can be experts on many things, but those introducing and supporting this bill are not experts on this topic. They have not done unbiased or true research into this; instead, many representatives and others uneducated on this topic are relying on harmful, biased, and skewed viewpoints on this matter.

All Ohio youth that want to take part in athletics belong in sports. Participation in sports is an invaluable part of students’ physical, social, and emotional well-being. Playing sports can provide student athletes with important lessons about leadership, self discipline, teamwork, success, and failure—as well as the joy and shared excitement of being part of a team. It can also positively impact their academics, making Ohio’s students competitive while also giving them strong roots in our state. Instead of celebrating and encouraging this amazing phenomenon, the anti-trans sports ban seeks to single out transgender young people for increased bullying and harassment by needlessly preventing them from participating in the sports they love.

I grew up not playing sports, as I was critically ill for much of my youth. By the time I was physically well enough to play a sport, I was an adult and really had no connections to sport itself. Living in Wisconsin at the time, I encountered a local hockey association that welcomed beginners and was heavily focused on making the space LGBTQ+ friendly. I learned more about myself and my ability to grow – both physically and emotionally – in the six months I played than I had in years prior.

With the pandemic shutting down my ability to play hockey (I’m immunocompromised), I also know what it’s like to be forced out from a space that I grew to love. It was hard to handle as an adult and, frankly, no child should ever have to go through that – especially when they’re barred from playing because of bigotry. The self-esteem impact that will have on these kids who are at pivotal points in their lives is something we cannot undo.

 

A Word on Gender Affirming Care

The anti-trans gender affirming care ban is another example of extreme government overreach. As has been repeatedly brought up, the bill is based on stigma and bias, not on science nor a genuine regard for the wellbeing of youth in Ohio.

Gender affirming care is safe, effective, and doctor-recommended medical care. This has been studied by health care providers, researchers, and many others for over 100 years, going back to the Institute for the Science of Sexuality (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft) founded in Germany in 1919. This institute helped study and pioneer health care for transgender folks, including hormones and surgery. It operated and served as a beacon internationally for acceptance and care. That is, until the Nazi regime raided the center on May 6, 1933. Soldiers and Nazi youth groups worked together to destroy research within the building, murder staff still located on site, and then burn over 20,000 books and pieces of research. A decent collection of research remained, giving us the ability to continue research and provide affirming care to the transgender community.

The state of Ohio must not penalize healthcare providers for providing good, standard, and necessary care to their patients. Furthermore, legislators with no medical knowledge must not practice medicine by pushing bills like this.

Ohio cannot push transgender healthcare back to the fear instilled in folks by the Nazi regime.

We cannot go backwards.

All Ohioans deserve access to health care, but especially health care that does not tell them they are abominations. That goes double for transgender youth. Most parents affirm their children and want them to feel at-home in their bodies – and in Ohio. These parents should not have to worry about their children’s ability to access care and treatment. They also should not have to worry if their children feel comfortable and welcome in spaces such as school or if their child may suffer a hate crime.

Children should NEVER be a political pawn.

As we’ve seen in other states that have passed similar bills — like Texas and Florida — these families will leave for more welcoming states, and Ohio will suffer for it.

I agree we must protect our children. The best way to do so is to ensure that they have access to best-practice physical and mental health treatment.

Instead, this bill directly puts already vulnerable LGBTQ+ youth at risk of losing access to vital, best-practice healthcare. We know that, without affirming healthcare, children and teens will commit suicide – and that’s not hyperbole.

As a teenager, I was happy. I was (relatively) healthy, too. When my personal hormone makeup changed and more estrogen was introduced because of puberty, I began to struggle. I experienced chronic pain – something I had before, but was definitely worsening – in addition to migraines and struggling with self-esteem and self-image far beyond what the average kid was facing.

The bubbly person who I was went away because of puberty. I became quiet, withdrawn, and experienced suicidal thoughts. I grew up in a home where I was not supported, and this exacerbated these thoughts.

It wasn’t until I started testosterone in January 2020 that I regained the contented feeling I had in my youth. And, no, it didn’t make me better at hockey – that’s a myth. What it did do was to help my chronic pain ease up and give me back my life. Prior to starting intense physical therapy, hockey, and testosterone, I could barely sit up for two hours straight without immense pain — or even passing out. I literally could not work for a few years. But after? I gained a whole new lease on life.

When I think about the years of major depression, relationship issues, suicidal thoughts, and chronic pain I endured because I did not have the option these kids have today, and then think about them getting this taken away from them?

The only word I can think of is monstrous, and it’s not a word Ohio needs to be associated with.

We can protect children and teens and allow them the ability to be who they are. It isn’t hard to do — puberty blockers (which only pause the process) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) aren’t rocket science. But, what they do is give us a proven way to ensure that transgender children grow into healthy and happy adults.

As someone who is passionate about equity in our world but especially in state legislation, I want to offer to serve as a resource for you. If there is anything that I can do to help share information with you to better enable you to make the most educated decisions possible, please know that I am here and happy to do so.

Sending all my best to you and your family in the holiday season,
A Proud Transgender Man in Athens

Want to get more newsletter-type posts from me? Subscribe to my Substack for free!